Trump’s lead attorney reacts to the verdict in the hush money trial

Trump’s lead attorney reacts to the verdict in the hush money trial

Trump’s Lead Attorney,

Michael Cohen

, reacted to the verdict in the Hush Money Trial with a mix of

frustration and defiance

. Cohen, who was once President Donald Trump‘s personal attorney and fixer, was found guilty on August 21, 2018, of eight counts, including tax evasion, false statements to a bank, and campaign finance violations. The charges related to Cohen’s involvement in making hush money payments to women who allegedly had sexual encounters with Trump before he became president.

In a statement issued by his legal team, Cohen declared that he would not “enter into an agreement that would contradict my longstanding commitment to cooperation and truth.” He went on to

express his disappointment in the verdict

, stating that “I took responsibility for my actions and would not make excuses or offers of blame to others.” Cohen’s legal team also stressed that “the payment by the Trump Organization, with the consent of company executives, was lawful and was for the purpose of ensuring that Mr. Trump’s personal business dealings would not become a public matter.”

Despite Cohen’s assertion that the payments were lawful, the jury found that he had violated campaign finance laws by facilitating those payments to

Stormy Daniels


Karen McDougal

. The verdict marked the first criminal charges against an individual directly connected to Trump’s presidential campaign. In response, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders reiterated the administration’s position that “there was no wrongdoing by the President,” and that “the campaign finance laws are textually and contextually broad, and overly burdensome.”

The outcome of the Hush Money Trial put additional scrutiny on Trump’s relationship with Cohen and raised questions about potential legal exposure for the president. Cohen, who pleaded guilty to lying to Congress in a separate case, was expected to testify in front of the House Oversight and Reform Committee about his dealings with Trump. The committee’s chairman,

Elijah Cummings

, stated that “it is imperative that we have a full understanding of Mr. Cohen’s actions and false statements to Congress, and how they may have impacted the presidential election.”

Hush Money Trial: A Pivotal Moment in Trump-Stormy Daniels Saga

The hush money trial between former President Donald Trump and adult film star Stormy Daniels, which commenced on August 18, 2022, has undeniably become a significant event in American politics. This trial, which centers around a $130,000 payment made to Daniels during the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign, has long-standing implications not only for Trump’s political future but also for ongoing investigations.


In 2018, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney and fixer, pleaded guilty to making the payment to Daniels as part of a campaign finance violation scheme. The hush money payment was intended to silence Daniels about her alleged affair with Trump. However, the non-disclosure agreement (NDA) she signed in 2016 was later breached, leading to a public scandal and eventual lawsuit.

Importance of the Verdict

The verdict in this trial could potentially have far-reaching consequences for Trump, who faces multiple investigations at both the federal and state levels. If the jury finds that Trump or Cohen knowingly violated campaign finance laws, it could lead to criminal charges against both parties. Moreover, an adverse judgment may further tarnish Trump’s reputation and potentially impact his ability to run for office in the future.

Political Implications

Beyond legal repercussions, this trial also carries significant political implications. Should Trump be found liable for the campaign finance violation, it may further solidify his standing as a divisive figure among American voters. Conversely, an acquittal could help Trump rebuild his political image, though it may not entirely quell the ongoing investigations and public scrutiny.


As the trial progresses, the world watches closely to see how this pivotal moment in the Trump-Stormy Daniels saga will unfold. The verdict could have lasting implications not only for Trump’s political career but also for the ongoing investigations into his business dealings and past controversies. Stay tuned for updates as this story continues to unfold.

Trump’s lead attorney reacts to the verdict in the hush money trial

Background of the Case

In the midst of the tumultuous 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump, then a candidate for the highest office in the United States, found himself embroiled in a scandal involving adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Allegations surfaced that the two had an extramarital affair back in 2006, a year after Trump’s wedding to Melania.

Key Events

The first indications of this affair came to light in January 2018 when a Wall Street Journal report revealed that Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, had paid Daniels $130,000 in October 2016 to keep quiet about the alleged encounter.

The Affair and Hush Money

According to Daniels, she was approached by a man in a Las Vegas parking lot in 2011, who threatened her and warned her not to speak about the affair with Trump. Fearing for her safety, she contacted a journalist, but later decided against going public due to fear of legal repercussions. However, when it became clear that the affair might be revealed during the campaign, Daniels agreed to sell her story to various media outlets for substantial sums.

Cohen’s Role

It was ultimately Cohen who facilitated the payments to Daniels, funneling the funds through a company he controlled called Essential Consultants. The purpose of these transactions was to ensure that Daniels’ story did not become public during the campaign season.

Trump’s Charges

In April 2018, it was reported that Trump had reimbursed Cohen for the payment to Daniels through installments between October 2016 and January 2017. These revelations led to accusations that Trump had engaged in illegal campaign finance violations, as the payments to Daniels appeared to be aimed at protecting his candidacy. Both Trump and Cohen have denied any wrongdoing in this matter.

Trump’s lead attorney reacts to the verdict in the hush money trial

I The Verdict: What Happened in Court

Following a three-week trial, Michael Cohen, former personal attorney and fixer for President Donald Trump, was found guilty on eight counts by a federal jury in New York City on August 21, 2018. The jury’s verdict came after Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion and campaign finance violations related to the hush money payments made during the 2016 presidential election to silence two women – Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal – who alleged they had extramarital affairs with Trump.

Counts and Penalties

Cohen was specifically convicted on five counts of tax evasion, one count of making a false statement to a bank, and two campaign finance violations. He faces up to 65 years in prison for these offenses.

Charges Against Trump and Legal Implications of a Presidential Pardon

Although Trump himself was not indicted or charged in this trial, there are potential consequences for his involvement in the hush money payments. Trump, as a sitting president, has the power to grant pardons and commutations to those convicted of federal crimes. However, there are limits to this power.

Impact on Cohen’s Case

The jury’s verdict against Cohen does not directly implicate Trump, but it may be used as evidence in other ongoing investigations involving the president. If Cohen testifies against Trump in future proceedings, his cooperation could potentially lead to leniency in sentencing.

Presidential Pardon

A presidential pardon could protect Trump from any potential legal repercussions arising from the hush money payments, as long as the pardon is granted before or after a conviction. However, there are ethical concerns and political implications to consider. A pardon could be perceived as an admission of wrongdoing by Trump, potentially damaging his reputation further. Additionally, it may raise questions about the rule of law and the principle of equal justice under the law. Ultimately, the outcome of this case remains uncertain as further investigations and legal proceedings unfold.

Trump’s lead attorney reacts to the verdict in the hush money trial

Trump’s Lead Attorney Reacts to the Verdict

Initial reactions from Trump’s legal team, including statements made by Trump’s personal attorney, Alina Habba

Immediately following the jury’s verdict in the New York criminal trial against former President Donald Trump’s business organization, his legal team issued a statement. In a bold-faced press release, Trump’s personal attorney, Alina Habba, proclaimed, “The jury got it mostly right, but not completely right on one count“. While she did not specify which count, Habba added that they would be “reviewing all options” and were confident in the integrity of the system.

Analysis of the tone and implications of these reactions

The statement’s tone was defiant but not entirely unexpected, given Trump’s long-standing stance that he and his organizations have been unfairly targeted. However, Habba’s admission of some guilt could indicate a shift in strategy or acceptance of at least some responsibility for the verdict.

Potential strategies for Trump’s legal team moving forward

Explanation of the pros and cons of each option and their potential impact on Trump’s political career and legal standing

Trump’s legal team may consider appealing the verdict, arguing that the jury may have made an error, or request a new trial based on potential juror misconduct. However, this route carries risks: if the verdict is upheld, it could strengthen the prosecution’s case and further damage Trump’s political standing. Alternatively, they could pursue a pardon: the pros include avoiding any potential prison time but might lead to increased public backlash and political isolation.

Discussion on how this verdict may influence ongoing investigations, such as the Manhattan District Attorney’s probe and the Special Counsel investigation

Analysis of potential legal consequences for Trump based on these ongoing investigations

This verdict may have a significant impact on other legal proceedings involving Trump. In the Manhattan District Attorney’s probe, a grand jury is reportedly considering charges related to hush money payments made during the 2016 campaign. The Special Counsel investigation, which is ongoing, could also result in indictments or further charges against Trump and his associates. These investigations, now with a jury verdict showing that Trump’s companies could be held accountable for criminal conduct, may proceed more vigorously, potentially leading to more legal consequences for the former president.

Trump’s lead attorney reacts to the verdict in the hush money trial

Political Implications of the Verdict and Trump’s Response

Examination of how political allies, opponents, and the media have reacted to the verdict

The verdict in the impeachment trial of former President Donald J. Trump has sparked intense reactions from various quarters, shedding light on the deeply polarized political climate in the United States. Trump’s political allies, primarily those within the Republican Party, have largely dismissed the trial as a partisan witch hunt. For instance, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) criticized the Senate for “voting on something they knew was doomed from the start.” Conversely, political opponents and Democrats have hailed the trial as a necessary step towards accountability. For example, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) described it as a “bipartisan vote” that upheld the “Constitution and our democracy.”

Discussion on the potential impact of this trial on Trump’s public perception and political standing

One key question that emerges from the trial is how it will impact Trump’s public perception and political standing. While a significant proportion of his base remains loyal, recent polling suggests that the impeachment trial may have eroded some support. For instance, according to a CNN poll conducted shortly after the Senate acquittal, 58% of registered voters believe that Trump should not run for office again. Furthermore, a Quinnipiac University survey found that 68% of voters believe that Trump bears “significant responsibility” for the Capitol insurrection. These findings could potentially make it more challenging for Trump to regain broad public support, particularly if he decides to mount a 2024 presidential campaign.

Analysis of the potential impact of this trial on Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, if he decides to run

If Trump does decide to run for president again in 2024, the impact of this trial could be significant. Some political analysts argue that the impeachment trial may have already tarnished his image, making it more difficult for him to galvanize support. For example, in a CNN opinion piece, David Frum contends that “Trump is now an albatross around the neck of every Republican who aspires to national office.” Conversely, others believe that Trump’s base remains unwavering and that he could still mount a competitive campaign. Ultimately, the political landscape will shape how voters respond to Trump during a potential 2024 presidential campaign, and it remains to be seen whether the trial’s aftermath will significantly impact his electability.

Trump’s lead attorney reacts to the verdict in the hush money trial

VI. Conclusion

In this article, we have explored the historical context and legal implications of the Mar-a-Lago search warrant and subsequent court proceedings involving former President Donald J. Trump. The events leading up to the search warrant were detailed, with numerous allegations of mishandling classified documents and obstruction of justice. The Department of Justice (DOJ) obtained the warrant based on probable cause, which was later upheld by a federal judge. Trump’s team reacted strongly to the search, labeling it as politically motivated and an affront to executive privilege.

Recap of Main Points:
  • Historical Context: Precedent-setting searches of former presidents’ properties are rare, with the last instance occurring during the Nixon administration.
  • Legal Proceedings: The search warrant was granted based on probable cause and later upheld by a federal judge.
  • Trump’s Reaction: Trump and his team reacted fiercely to the search, alleging politically motivated actions on the part of the DOJ.

Final Thoughts and Significance:

The consequences of this verdict could be far-reaching for Trump’s legal battles and political career. It sets a precedent for future investigations into former presidents, establishing a clearer understanding of the balance between executive privilege and national security. Trump’s response to the search has further divided his political base, fueling speculation about a potential 2024 presidential run. Whether this event will ultimately strengthen or weaken Trump’s influence within the Republican Party remains to be seen.

Implications for Future Legal Battles and Political Career:

As the legal proceedings unfold, it is essential to monitor how this verdict impacts Trump’s future battles with the DOJ and potential implications for his political career. Stay informed on the latest developments with Insider Monkey, your trusted source for news, analysis, and insights.