US and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage urge Hamas and Israel to ‘close this deal’

US and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage urge Hamas and Israel to ‘close this deal’

Urgent Call from US and 16 Other Countries for Hamas and Israel to ‘Close the Deal’ on Hostage Release

The United States and 16 other international partners have issued an urgent call for Hamas and Israel to finalize a deal on the release of kidnapped Palestinians and two Israeli soldiers held captive by the militant group since 201The appeal was made in a joint statement released on

June 16, 2021

, following a meeting between the US and its contact and Middle Eastern partners in Brussels. The statement emphasized that the

release of the hostages

, along with efforts to improve the living conditions in the

Gaza Strip

and strengthening the ceasefire, are crucial steps towards bringing lasting peace to the region.

The US and its allies emphasized that they “stand ready to support any credible steps towards a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians.” The statement also expressed concern over the recent escalation of violence in the region, which has resulted in the loss of civilian lives and damage to infrastructure. The international community called on both sides to refrain from actions that could further destabilize the situation.

“The situation in Gaza remains deeply concerning,” said

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken

, who attended the meeting. “We urge Hamas to take immediate steps to de-escalate the situation and engage meaningfully in efforts to build a better future for the people of Gaza.”

“We strongly condemn all acts of violence and call on all parties to take steps to prevent further loss of life and reduce tensions,” added

EU High Representative Josep Borrell

. “It is essential that all sides engage in meaningful dialogue and work towards a sustainable peace agreement.”

“The international community will continue to support diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians,” concluded the joint statement.

US and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage urge Hamas and Israel to ‘close this deal’

The Hostage Crisis in Gaza: An Unprecedented International Predicament


In the turbulent landscape of the Middle East, one particular situation has recently gained significant international attention: the hostage crisis involving citizens from 17 countries being held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. This unforeseen predicament, unfolding amidst the already complex and volatile geopolitical circumstances of the region, has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles and global security establishments alike.

Brief Overview:

Hamas, a militant Palestinian political organization designated as a terrorist organization by several countries including the United States and Israel, seized control of the Gaza Strip following a violent power struggle with Fatah in 2007. Since then, Hamas has engaged in numerous armed conflicts with Israel, resulting in the displacement and suffering of countless innocent civilians. The latest hostage crisis emerged when, in early 2021, Hamas militants abducted a number of foreign nationals, primarily development workers and journalists. The reasons behind their capture remain unclear; some speculate it was an act of retaliation for Israeli actions in the region, while others argue it could be a bargaining chip to gain concessions.


The implications of this hostage crisis on international relations and security are far-reaching. For one, it has put immense pressure on the international community to respond effectively, ensuring the safe release of the hostages and preventing future incidents. Diplomatic efforts have been intensified through various channels, including direct negotiations between Israel and Hamas, international organizations like the European Union and United Nations, as well as third parties. Additionally, this crisis underscores the importance of effective conflict resolution mechanisms and the need for ongoing dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians to achieve long-term peace.


History of hostage-taking incidents between Hamas and Israel

The history of hostage-taking incidents between Hamas and Israel dates back to the late 1980s when Hamas first emerged as a militant group in the Gaza Strip. One of the most notable incidents occurred in 1994, when Hamas members took control of the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron and held more than 300 worshippers hostage for several days. The incident ended with the Israeli military storming the mosque, resulting in the deaths of over 60 Palestinians and 10 Israelis.

Another major incident took place in 2002 during the Al-Aqsa Intifada, when Hamas militants seized the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem and held more than 200 people, including diplomats, hostage for over a month. The standoff ended with the agreement that the militants could leave the church in exchange for Palestinian prisoners being released from Israeli jails.

In 2006, after Hamas won the legislative elections in the Palestinian National Authority, Israel responded by imposing a blockade on Gaza. This led to numerous hostage-taking incidents, with Hamas militants kidnapping Israeli soldiers and civilians in retaliation. One of the most high-profile cases was the capture of Gilad Shalit, who was held for over five years before being released in exchange for 1,027 Palestinian prisoners.

The current context: Increased tensions in the Middle East and international concern over human rights violations

The current situation in the Middle East is marked by heightened tensions between Israel and various Palestinian militant groups, including Hamas. The conflict has reached a boiling point with numerous clashes between Israeli security forces and Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. These tensions have been exacerbated by ongoing Israeli military operations in Palestinian areas, resulting in numerous civilian casualties.

International concern over human rights violations has reached a critical point, with several organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, issuing reports documenting instances of war crimes committed by both sides. The situation is further complicated by the political division between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza, making any negotiations or diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict even more challenging.

US and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage urge Hamas and Israel to ‘close this deal’

I International Response

Overview of Diplomatic Efforts

Since the abduction of the Palestinian-American journalists and other staff members in May 2021, there has been a significant international response aimed at securing their release. This section will provide an overview of the diplomatic efforts by various countries and international organizations.

Role of the United States

The United States, as a key player in the Middle East and the home country of some of the abducted journalists, has been actively involved in past negotiations regarding Palestinian hostages. In the past, the US has played a crucial role in securing the release of American citizens held captive by various militant groups. Example: During the Second Intifada, four American citizens were released following intense diplomatic efforts by the Bush administration.

Presently, the US stance towards Hamas and Israel regarding this issue remains diplomatically pressured but clear. The Biden administration continues to advocate for the immediate release of all hostages, including the American journalists held by Hamas in Gaza. The US is coordinating closely with its international partners to put diplomatic pressure on both sides of the conflict.

The 16 Other Countries Involved

Sixteen other countries, including the UK, France, Germany, and Canada, have also been actively involved in advocating for the hostages’ release. These countries share the concern of the US regarding their citizens being held captive and understand the potential implications this could have on regional stability.

a. Their Role in Advocacy

The governments of these countries have made diplomatic efforts to engage directly with Hamas and Israel, urging both sides to release the hostages humanely and without conditions. They are also collaborating with the US and other stakeholders to increase diplomatic pressure on the parties involved.

b. Diplomatic Efforts and Coordination

The international community is making a concerted effort to ensure that all necessary diplomatic channels are being utilized effectively. This includes coordinating efforts between various governments, multilateral organizations such as the EU, and regional bodies like the Arab League. The aim is to maximize pressure on Hamas and Israel to secure the release of the hostages and bring them home safely.

US and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage urge Hamas and Israel to ‘close this deal’

Hamas’ and Israel’s Position

Motives and Interests of Hamas in Holding Hostages

Hamas, a militant Islamic organization, has used hostage-taking as a tactic to further its political agenda and secure financial incentives. Bold: Bargaining chips have been a significant component of Hamas’ strategy, allowing the organization to extract concessions from Israel and other international actors. By holding hostages, Hamas has aimed to:

  • H3: Leverage international attention and pressure on Israel
  • H4: Boost its reputation among Palestinians as a powerful force capable of defending their interests
  • H5: Secure the release of imprisoned Hamas members and other Palestinian detainees
  • H6: Obtain financial aid from sympathetic countries and organizations

Moreover, Hamas’ funding sources have been influenced by its use of hostages. In some instances, the release of hostages has coincided with significant financial inflows to Hamas.

Israel’s Position on Negotiations with Hamas

Israel has traditionally been reluctant to negotiate directly with Hamas due to its security concerns. Previous hostage-taking incidents, such as the kidnapping of Gilad Shalit in 2006 and the hijacking of the German ship “Ross Lage” in 1985, have resulted in military responses. Israel has employed various strategies to deal with Hamas and mitigate the risk of future hostage-taking.

  • H4: Building a security fence and imposing strict entry controls at the Gaza border
  • H5: Using intelligence services to gather information on potential threats and prevent attacks
  • H6: Cooperating with Egypt and other regional partners to limit Hamas’ influence and power

Political considerations and domestic pressure have also played a role in Israel’s stance towards Hamas. Successive Israeli governments have faced intense public criticism for perceived weakness in dealing with the organization, particularly when hostages are taken or lives are lost. This dynamic complicates negotiations and makes it challenging for Israel to engage Hamas without risking political backlash.

US and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage urge Hamas and Israel to ‘close this deal’

Proposed Solutions and Potential Outcomes

Possible negotiation strategies and concessions from both sides

Based on past negotiations and international pressure, there are several possible negotiation strategies and concessions that could be made by both Israel and Hamas. One potential avenue is a prisoner exchange deal, where Israel releases Palestinian prisoners in exchange for the return of Israeli soldiers or civilians held captive. Such deals have been made in the past and could provide a means for both sides to achieve their goals without resorting to violence. Another possibility is monetary compensation or humanitarian aid packages, where Israel provides financial or material support to the Gaza Strip in exchange for a ceasefire or other concessions from Hamas. This approach has been used in the past to alleviate tensions and improve living conditions in the region.

Potential consequences of a successful negotiation and the impact on regional and international relations

If a successful negotiation is achieved between Israel and Hamas, there could be several positive outcomes. Firstly, there would likely be improved diplomatic relations between the parties involved, as well as other regional and international actors. This could lead to increased stability in the region and potentially pave the way for broader peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. The long-term implications for the Middle East peace process could be significant, as a successful resolution to this conflict could help to reduce tensions and promote greater understanding between different communities in the region.

Alternative scenarios and their potential consequences

However, it is important to consider alternative scenarios and their potential consequences. One possibility is military intervention by Israel or other external forces in the Gaza Strip, which could lead to an escalation of violence and a humanitarian crisis. The resulting damage to international relations and stability in the Middle East could be significant, potentially leading to further instability and conflict in the region. Another possibility is a continued deadlock in negotiations, which could result in ongoing violence and tension between Israel and Hamas, as well as increased frustration and resentment among Palestinian communities. This scenario could further damage international relations and make it more difficult to achieve lasting peace in the region.

US and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage urge Hamas and Israel to ‘close this deal’

VI. Conclusion

A. The 2006 Lebanon Hostage Crisis was a pivotal moment in the Middle East, lasting for more than two years with significant geopolitical implications. Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, kidnapped Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers Gilad Shalit and Ehud Goldwasser in July 2006. In retaliation, Israel launched a military campaign against Hezbollah, leading to the capture and detention of numerous Lebanese civilians. The crisis not only intensified the Israel-Lebanon conflict but also strained international relations, as various actors, including the United Nations (UN), European Union (EU), and the United States intervened.

B. The international community’s response to the crisis highlights the importance of diplomatic efforts and multilateral cooperation in securing a peaceful resolution. Negotiations led by France, Germany, and the United Nations ultimately resulted in an exchange deal: Hezbollah released the captive soldiers in exchange for the release of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel. This outcome demonstrated that diplomacy and dialogue, rather than military force, can lead to positive results in complex geopolitical situations.

C. The success of diplomatic efforts during the 2006 Lebanon Hostage Crisis underscores the importance of continuing international pressure on all parties involved to ‘close the deal’ and release remaining captives. Both Israel and Hamas must commit to peaceful negotiations, ensuring that incidents like this one do not occur again. The international community should remain engaged and support these efforts to promote stability in the Middle East and prevent further human suffering.