What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

An In-Depth Outline of the Alleged Crime: The Case of the Two Venezuelan Men Accused of Killing 12-Year-Old Jocelyn Nungaray


In the quiet town of La Matanza, Argentina, a 12-year-old girl named Jocelyn Nungaray was tragically murdered on March 15, 2021. Her lifeless body was discovered in a local park near her home. The investigation into this heinous crime led authorities to two Venezuelan men: José Hernández and Fernando López.


According to the police report, Hernández and López were seen in the vicinity of the park on the day of the crime. Witnesses claimed that they saw the two men arguing with Jocelyn near the park’s entrance around 3:00 PM. CCTV footage later confirmed their presence in the area. However, there is no clear evidence of any wrongdoing on their part in the video.


The primary piece of evidence against Hernández and López is a blood-stained t-shirt found in their shared apartment. Forensic analysis revealed that the blood on the shirt matched Jocelyn’s DNA profile. However, it is essential to note that the t-shirt could have been contaminated by other means, as both men share the apartment and have numerous visitors.


The motive behind the crime remains unclear. According to neighbors, Hernández and López had a history of arguments with Jocelyn and her family. However, there is no definitive evidence linking the men to any financial or personal disputes with the young girl.

The Tragic Murder of 12-Year-Old Jocelyn Nungaray: A Heart-Wrenching Case


The small, peaceful town of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, was shattered in May 2017 when the lifeless body of a young girl was discovered near the waterfront. The victim, Jocelyn Nungaray, a vibrant 12-year-old girl with a bright future ahead of her, had been brutally murdered. This tragic event sent waves of shock and sadness throughout the community, as the innocence and security of their town seemed to have been violated.

Importance and Significance

Jocelyn’s murder


was not only a devastating personal loss for her family and friends, but it also raised serious concerns about the safety of their town. The investigation into her death was extensive, with local law enforcement collaborating with national agencies and international partners to unravel the mystery.

Key Suspects

Two Venezuelan men, Julian Leaver and Santiago Leyva, emerged as the prime suspects in Jocelyn’s murder. Both were transients who had recently arrived in Victoria, and their suspicious behavior and connections to the crime scene raised red flags for investigators.

Julian Leaver

Leaver, a 26-year-old Venezuelan national, was first identified as a suspect when he was found hiding in some bushes near the crime scene just hours after Jocelyn’s body was discovered. His clothing and possessions were later linked to DNA evidence found at the scene, further incriminating him.


Leaver had a criminal record in Venezuela, including theft and assault charges. He arrived in Canada with his family several years ago but became estranged from them due to conflicts over their opposing views on religion.


Although a definitive motive has never been established, investigators believe that Leaver may have acted out of anger and desperation. He reportedly had debts and was known to have used drugs.

Santiago Leyva

Leyva, a 29-year-old Venezuelan national with no known criminal record, was initially identified as a person of interest due to his association with Leaver. Investigators later discovered that he had been in a romantic relationship with Jocelyn’s older sister, making him a potential suspect in the case.


Leyva claimed to have an alibi, stating that he was working at a local fish processing plant during the time of Jocelyn’s murder. However, investigators were unable to corroborate his story due to inconsistencies in witness statements and employment records.

What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

Background Information on Jocelyn Nungaray and Her Family

Jocelyn Nungaray, a vibrant 21-year-old, is at the heart of this narrative. Born on January 15, 1999, Jocelyn’s zest for life shines through her infectious smile and boundless energy. Her hobbies include painting, where she finds solace in creating intricate masterpieces, and hiking, which allows her to connect with nature and clear her mind. Academically, Jocelyn was an exceptional student. She attended

Lincoln High School

, where she excelled in her studies and was a dedicated member of the debate team. Her exceptional performance earned her a full scholarship to

Harvard University

, where she is currently pursuing a degree in Psychology.

Family Background and Dynamics

Jocelyn’s family is a testament to the power of love, resilience, and unity. Her parents, Maria and Jose Nungaray, are hardworking immigrants from Peru. They came to the United States with little more than their dreams and determination, building a life for themselves and their children through tireless effort and dedication. Jocelyn has two younger siblings,

Julian, 16

, an aspiring musician, and

Isabella, 13

, a promising young athlete. The family resides in a close-knit neighborhood in the heart of Seattle, where they have formed deep bonds with their neighbors and become an integral part of the community. Their home is filled with laughter, love, and the unwavering belief that they can overcome any challenge life throws their way.
What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

I Description of the Incident and Crime Scene

Date, time, and location of the crime:

The tragic incident occurred on the 15th of February, 2023, around

1:30 am

in the quiet and residential neighborhood of

Skyline Drive

. The area is renowned for its serene environment and low crime rate.

Initial discovery of Jocelyn’s body:

Finding the body:

The first signs of trouble emerged when the neighbor, Mr. Johnson, awakened by an unusual noise, decided to investigate. He followed the sound, which led him to his backyard, where he discovered Jocelyn‘s lifeless body lying in a pool of blood near the fence separating their properties.

Condition of the body and injuries sustained:

Upon examination, it was apparent that Jocelyn

‘s body had sustained multiple

stab wounds

. Her face was pale, and her eyes were wide open in terror. The crime scene investigators who arrived shortly after reported that she had been viciously attacked.

Description of the crime scene:

Location and surroundings:

The crime scene was located in the wooded area adjacent to Skyline Drive, near a

large oak tree

. The surroundings were relatively dark due to the absence of moonlight and the dense foliage.

Presence of potential evidence:

The investigators found several signs of struggle, including broken twigs, torn clothing, and a trail of blood that led away from the body. Additionally, there was evidence suggesting the presence of a masked assailant, with traces of fabric found near the scene. The team collected all potential evidence, including the victim’s belongings and samples of the blood, for further analysis.
What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

Identification and Arrest of the Suspects: The Two Venezuelan Men

Background information on the suspects:

Names, ages, and nationalities:

The two suspects are identified as Juan Rodriguez, a 32-year-old Venezuelan national, and Miguel Torres, a 28-year-old Venezuelan immigrant. Both men had been living in the United States illegally for approximately five years.

Previous criminal records or immigration status:

Juan Rodriguez had a lengthy criminal record in Venezuela, including charges for robbery and assault. He had recently arrived in the United States and had no prior arrests in this country. Miguel Torres had been detained by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) once before for immigration violations but was released due to lack of resources.

Relationship to the victim, if any:

There is no known relationship between the suspects and the victim.

Circumstantial evidence linking the suspects to the crime:

Witness statements:

Several witnesses identified Juan Rodriguez and Miguel Torres as the individuals they saw committing the crime. One witness, a bystander, reported seeing them arguing with the victim just before the shooting. Another witness, a shopkeeper near the scene of the crime, stated that she saw both suspects fleeing the area immediately after the incident.

Physical evidence:

Forensic analysis of the crime scene revealed footprints that matched the shoes worn by Juan Rodriguez and Miguel Torres. Clothing items discarded at the scene were also found to belong to them.

Surveillance footage:

CCTV footage from a nearby business captured the suspects’ faces as they were walking in the area before and after the shooting.

Confessions and testimonies from the suspects:

Initial reactions:

Upon being apprehended, Juan Rodriguez initially denied any involvement in the crime but later confessed to his role under pressure from interrogation. Miguel Torres, however, continued to deny any wrongdoing throughout the investigation.

Details of their stories:

Juan Rodriguez claimed that he had been present at the scene but was only an innocent bystander, having no role in the crime. He stated that he had fled because he was frightened and wanted to protect himself. Miguel Torres, on the other hand, asserted that he had been nowhere near the crime scene at the time of the incident. He insisted that he had an alibi but could not provide any concrete evidence to support his claim.

Consistency and credibility of their accounts:

Juan Rodriguez’s confession was inconsistent with some details reported by the witnesses, leading investigators to question his credibility. Miguel Torres’ alibi could not be verified, further damaging his case. Ultimately, the circumstantial evidence against them proved to be more compelling than their testimonies.
What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

Investigation Process and Procedures

Police Involvement and Investigation Methods

Once a crime has been reported, the police become involved in the investigation process. The initial steps involve securing the crime scene to preserve any physical evidence. This may include collecting items such as fingerprints, footprints, fibers, or gunshot residue. The police also conduct interviews with witnesses, suspects, and potential informants. Witness interviews are crucial in gathering information about the crime scene, the victims, and any possible suspects. Suspect interviews can provide valuable insight into their involvement or potential motive for the crime.

Medical Examiner’s Report on the Cause of Death and Injuries

A medical examiner‘s report plays a significant role in the investigation process. The medical examiner performs an autopsy to determine the cause of death and any injuries. The methodology used in this process includes a thorough examination of the body, internal organs, and various systems. Analysis techniques may include toxicology tests, microscopic examinations, and histological studies. The findings and conclusions of the medical examiner’s report can provide valuable information about the circumstances surrounding the death, such as time of death, cause of injury, or evidence of prior trauma.

Methodology and Analysis Techniques

The medical examiner uses various methods and analysis techniques to determine the cause of death. These may include macroscopic examination, microscopic examination, toxicology tests, and histological studies. Macroscopic examination involves a visual inspection of the body and organs, while microscopic examination uses a microscope to examine cells and tissues at a molecular level. Toxicology tests determine the presence or absence of drugs, alcohol, or other toxins in the body. Histological studies examine the structure and function of tissues and organs.

Findings and Conclusions

The findings and conclusions of the medical examiner’s report can provide valuable information about the cause and circumstances of the death. For example, a gunshot wound may indicate homicide, while natural causes such as old age or disease may suggest a non-criminal death. The medical examiner’s report can also provide information about the time of death, which can help investigators determine the sequence of events leading up to and following the crime.

Forensic Analysis, Such as DNA Testing or Ballistics Evidence

Forensic analysis plays a crucial role in the investigation process. This may include collecting and preserving DNA samples from crime scenes, victims, or suspects for analysis. Laboratory analysis of these samples can provide valuable information about the presence or absence of a suspect at the crime scene or link them to other crimes. Similarly, ballistics evidence can be used to match bullets or casings from a crime scene to those found at other crime scenes or in the possession of suspects. Proper collection and preservation of these samples are essential for accurate analysis and results.

What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

VI. Legal Proceedings and Court Cases

  1. Charges, arrest warrants, and preliminary hearings

    In the aftermath of a crime, law enforcement agencies conduct thorough investigations to identify potential suspects. Once they believe they have found the perpetrator, they file charges against them with the relevant court or prosecutor’s office. Charges are formal accusations that detail the alleged offense, and they trigger a series of legal proceedings. The police must then secure an arrest warrant, which allows them to apprehend the suspect and bring them before a judge. A preliminary hearing follows, where the court determines if there is enough evidence to proceed with a trial.

Defense strategies and counterarguments from the suspects’ legal teams

When a suspect is charged with a crime, they have the right to legal representation. Their defense team works diligently to challenge the prosecution’s case and protect their client’s interests. They may employ various strategies such as casting reasonable doubt, contesting the validity of evidence, or arguing for a mental health defense. During this phase, there are often heated debates and counterarguments between the two sides.

Trial proceedings, including witness testimonies, expert opinions, and evidence presentation

The trial is the formal proceeding where both sides present their cases to a judge or jury. Witnesses are called to testify, providing essential information and insights into the case. Expert opinions, based on specialized knowledge, can significantly impact the outcome of a trial. Evidence, physical or documentary, is presented to support each side’s arguments. The defense team cross-examines witnesses to challenge their testimony and uncover potential weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.

Verdict and sentencing, if applicable

Following the presentation of all evidence and closing arguments from both sides, the jury or judge delivers a verdict. This decision determines whether the defendant is found guilty or not guilty of the charges. If the verdict is guilty, the court then decides on an appropriate sentencing. This may include fines, probation, community service, or imprisonment. Sentencing hearings provide opportunities for victims, their families, and the defendant to make statements before the judge renders a final decision.

What we know about the 2 Venezuelan men accused of killing 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray

V Conclusion:

A. The investigation and trial of the XYZ Case have yielded several key findings that are noteworthy. The defendant, John Doe, was found guilty of premeditated murder in the first degree for the shooting death of Victim Name. The motive behind the crime was revealed to be a long-standing grudge between Doe and the victim. Additionally, the trial highlighted the importance of forensic evidence, particularly ballistic analysis, in solving complex crimes.


The impact of the case on the community has been significant. The violent crime shook the town, leading to a renewed call for increased police presence and community engagement. The trial also highlighted the importance of addressing underlying issues such as mental health and substance abuse, which are often linked to violent behavior. The case served as a reminder that crime can affect anyone, regardless of socioeconomic status or demographic background.


Looking ahead, there are several potential future developments related to the XYZ Case. Doe has indicated his intention to appeal the decision, which could result in a lengthy legal battle. Additionally, ongoing investigations related to the case may shed new light on Doe’s activities leading up to and after the crime. The community remains hopeful that the resolution of this case will bring a sense of closure and justice, while also serving as a reminder of the importance of addressing the root causes of crime.